I’ve written on the unfair notions that often flow from those who oppose religion.  My latest piece entitled “Flawed Inclinations Are No MisterE” brought about quite an odd reaction from MisterE:

“I’m sorry Billy, I didn’t read your entire post because even the first few sentences are wrought with errors, misinterpretations, weird comebacks (as if you were a child on a playground), and circular arguments.” – MisterE

Oddly, the first sentence of that particular piece was comprised of his own words:

“…I’m so outspoken about the positives of atheism and the negatives of religion.” – MisterE

Then, I wrote:

“We’re still waiting to hear about these alleged positives. So far, all MisterE has provided is personal opinion flavored with incessant rhetoric.” – Me

So, where are the errors, misinterpretations and weird comments?  I’m confused.  I wouldn’t even claim his first sentence fit that bill, although I find it flagrant.

“You’ve yet to provide us with any evidence that evolution did not occur. Until you do so, I will not consider any new argument from you, no matter how terribly undereducated or poorly thought out it is.” – MisterE

And he’s yet to provide us with viable evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that it did occur.

Now, I’m undereducated.  And I poorly draft my ideas, which is interesting considering that’s the first time I’ve been charged with such a crime.  But, I suppose that’s what we do when we don’t understand the thoughts or perceptions of others — call them dumb and refuse to listen to them.

If you missed the piece, read it here.

I suppose I’m not the only child on the playground.